[S.Li.P] connessione internet saltata tramite router
Davide Corio
enlightx a gmail.com
Gio 28 Dic 2023 20:40:12 CET
Presumo connessione wifi ad una certa distanza dal router
Il gio 28 dic 2023, 20:36 Valentino Bocchino via SLiP <
slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
> Siamo sicuri che sia solo una questione di DNS? Perché una latenza di
> 1797ms verso 8.8.8.8 è indecente.
>
> Il gio 28 dic 2023, 16:50 Alessandra Neve via SLiP <
> slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
>
>> tipo Ip4 o IPv6?
>>
>> Il giorno gio 28 dic 2023 alle ore 16:49 Alessandra Neve <
>> alessandra.neve a gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> E' quello che ho pensato io (credo mi fosse già capitato). Ma le mie
>>> conoscenze si fermano qui e stavolta non riesco a trovare info alla mia
>>> portata che mi permettano l'impostazione manuale.
>>> Qualche dritta? Link dove guardare?
>>> grazie..
>>>
>>> Il giorno gio 28 dic 2023 alle ore 16:45 Davide Corio via SLiP <
>>> slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Probabilmente è solo un problema di DNS.
>>>> Magari il router sta fornendo DNS che non vanno.
>>>>
>>>> Puoi provare ad impostarli manualmente su PC.
>>>> Tipo 8.8.8.8 che è quello di Google, oppure OpenDNS o simili che
>>>> generalmente sono meglio di quelli del provider.
>>>>
>>>> Il gio 28 dic 2023, 16:39 Alessandra Neve via SLiP <
>>>> slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah già, dimenticavo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *:~$ ping -c 5 8.8.8.8*PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=25.6 ms
>>>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=18.8 ms
>>>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=118 time=395 ms
>>>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=118 time=1797 ms
>>>>> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=118 time=811 ms
>>>>>
>>>>> --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
>>>>> 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4034ms
>>>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 18.774/609.532/1797.103/661.394 ms, pipe 2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno gio 28 dic 2023 alle ore 16:38 Davide Corio via SLiP <
>>>>> slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Se lanci un semplice ping 8.8.8.8 che dice?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Il gio 28 dic 2023, 16:23 Alessandra Neve via SLiP <
>>>>>> slip a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org> ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ciao
>>>>>>> non so se sia OT visto che non riguarda solo il mio portatile con
>>>>>>> mate 20.04, ma anche l'altro col SO più antipatico del globo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I 2 portatili vedono il router tp-link a cui risultano connessi
>>>>>>> correttamente ma da nessuno dei due si accede ad internet da quando il
>>>>>>> portatile materno (il terzo) con win 11 ha provato a connettersi anche
>>>>>>> lui...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Se ci colleghiamo tramite antenna BBBell navighiamo, ma attraverso
>>>>>>> il router no.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove basic effettuate senza risultati:
>>>>>>> - spegnimento e riaccensione (anche del frigorifero)
>>>>>>> - togli e metti cavi
>>>>>>> - riavvia pc
>>>>>>> - rete domestica vs rete pubblica
>>>>>>> - verifica antivirus
>>>>>>> - pennichella per rilassarsi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Output dei comandi:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *~$ route -n*
>>>>>>> Tabella di routing IP del kernel
>>>>>>> Destinazione Gateway Genmask Flag Metric Ref Usa Iface
>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0 192.168.43.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0
>>>>>>> 0 wlo1
>>>>>>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0
>>>>>>> 0 wlo1
>>>>>>> 192.168.43.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 600 0
>>>>>>> 0 wlo1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *~$ ifconfig*
>>>>>>> eno1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>>>>>> ether e8:d8:d1:33:a3:c3 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>>>>>>> RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
>>>>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>>>>> TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
>>>>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
>>>>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
>>>>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
>>>>>>> loop txqueuelen 1000 (Loopback locale)
>>>>>>> RX packets 20400 bytes 1728204 (1.7 MB)
>>>>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>>>>> TX packets 20400 bytes 1728204 (1.7 MB)
>>>>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wlo1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>>>>>> inet 192.168.43.104 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
>>>>>>> 192.168.43.255
>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::20dc:9997:69df:ad54 prefixlen 64 scopeid
>>>>>>> 0x20<link>
>>>>>>> ether c0:e4:34:73:29:3d txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>>>>>>> RX packets 31221 bytes 124773013 (124.7 MB)
>>>>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 8812 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>>>>> TX packets 30073 bytes 70483494 (70.4 MB)
>>>>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 196 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prima di addentrarmi oltre, ho pensato a voi, prodi linuxiani.
>>>>>>> mciù
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> SLiP mailing list
>>>>>>> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
>>>>>>> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> SLiP mailing list
>>>>>> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
>>>>>> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> SLiP mailing list
>>>>> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
>>>>> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> SLiP mailing list
>>>> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
>>>> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>>>>
>>> --
>> SLiP mailing list
>> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
>> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>>
> --
> SLiP mailing list
> SLiP a liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org
> https://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/listinfo/slip
>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://liszt.softwareliberopinerolo.org/pipermail/slip/attachments/20231228/9500305c/attachment.htm>
Maggiori informazioni sulla lista
SLiP